Einzelnen Beitrag anzeigen
  #64  
Alt 03.06.2009, 12:47
Benutzerbild von Christiane1609
Christiane1609 Christiane1609 ist offline
Registrierter Benutzer
 
Registriert seit: 18.03.2009
Ort: Köln
Beiträge: 191
Standard AW: triple negativ

Hallo,

inzwischen habe ich mich noch mal mit den Statistiken beschäftigt (was man vielleicht besser gar nicht tun sollte?). Ich habe auch etwas "Positives" zu Triple negativ gefunden:

"63 percent of women with triple-negative status survive progression-free for three years, compared to 76 percent of hormone-positive women. That’s a lower number, but it still means most women survive. This comes from research in the International Journal of Cancer.

Women with hormone negative had a lower risk of recurrence at five years than hormone positive, according to research at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. Five years after beginning therapy—chemotherapy, radiation, tamoxifen or all three—those with hormone negative disease faced a seven percent chance of recurrence, while those with hormone positive had a 13 percent chance. Or looking at it another way, 93 percent of those with hormone negative survived after five years while 87 percent of those with hormone positive did.

Docs say that, because more hormone-negative cases relapse within the first three years, women with this disease who are disease-free at five years have especially good odds. And at five years post-diagnosis, they have a better prognosis than women with the less lethal form of cancer."

Wir müssen halt nur die 5 Jahre schaffen (und daran habe ich keinen Zweifel).

Gruß
Christiane
Mit Zitat antworten